hacking democracy is a revealing documentary you aught to see, and it was made many years ago;

https://youtu.be/t75xvZ3osFg

 eight minutes with brother nathanael speaking on voter fraud;

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=216324

 twenty four seconds in which joe biden speaks of the great voter fraud efforts they've made;

https://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/biden-voter-fraud/276269

 mr smith herein describes the results of 'our' governments actions and where its heading;

Concentrate wealth and power in the hands of the few at the expense of the many and you guarantee collapse.

Very few are willing to to face the reality that the U.S. economy was on life support long before Covid came on the scene. In a nutshell:

1. Every layer of the economy is vastly over-indebted, and entire swaths are zombies, unable to service their existing debts without borrowing more at lower rates of interest.

2. Productivity has stagnated for decades as capital has been incentivized to seek productivity-killing monopolies and cartels, and socially-economically destructive speculations rather than investments that increased productivity in a socially beneficial manner.

3. Earned income/wages have been in a 50-year decline as a percentage of the economy. In effect, $50 trillion has been shifted from productive work to unproductive speculative gains. (see chart below) The Top 1% of Americans Have Taken $50 Trillion From the Bottom 90%, And That's Made the U.S. Less Secure (time.com)

4. This enormous shift from productive labor to unproductive speculation has mortally wounded our society and economy. When corporations borrow billions from the Federal Reserve's limitless spigot of free money for financiers and use this money to buy back their shares, this enriches the 0.1% who own the majority of shares and the corporate insiders with immense stashes of stock options.

This kind of financial sleight of hand doesn't add a single job or a single dollar of productive investment. Yet this is precisely what the Fed's free money for financiers incentivizes.

5. This tremendous concentration of wealth in the hands of the few has further concentrated power in the hands of the few. Ours is now a completely pay-to-play simulacrum of democracy in which the few buy political influence and power........read more......

 some will believe this writer to be casandra but i suspect he's just being accurate;

For many years, I’ve described a period that I envisaged to be in the future, in which much of what was considered “normal” would change dramatically.

The borders of some countries would change. The types of governments that ruled over them would change. In some cases, they would morph slowly into new entities; in others they would change suddenly.

Much of the wealth in the world would change hands. Enormous fortunes would be made by a few, whilst the life savings of countless others would be lost.

Large numbers of people would be on the move. Many would be refugees, hoping to escape poverty and/or oppressive governments. Others would be opportunists – those who look for the positives in periods of global upset.

Above all, this would be a period of change.

For most people, this would one day be looked back upon as previous generations looked back on the World Wars or the Great Depression – a time of devastation, in which many people lost all or most of what they had had.

But for some, especially those who foresaw the change, this period would one day be looked back upon as the time when their fortunes changed dramatically for the better.

Until recently, those who have predicted this dramatic change have been largely derided as “doom-and-gloomers” or “end-of-the-world crackpots.”

And it has been difficult to argue against this view, as regardless of how accurately we might have described what was headed our way, it was impossible to put a date on the onset of the crisis.

I became convinced of its eventuality in 1999, due to economic and political developments that would result in collapse at some point.

But the speed at which this would occur, and what governments and others would do to delay the eventuality, could not be known in advance. .......read more......

 those in charge don't like to be questioned and that i believe is at the base of the 'selection' outrage this go around, and i don't think things will improve but hornberger asks a few good questions here and provides some historical evidence;

For the life of me, I just don’t get the mainstream media’s vehement objections to President Trump’s desire to investigate whether Joe Biden ending up winning the election through fraud. Their argument, repeated from the very moment that Biden was declared the winner and ever since, is that Trump’s claims of fraud are “false” and “baseless.”

But secrecy is normally at the core of fraud. While there might be isolated cases where, say, a person is caught voting twice, it’s rare that massive fraud manifests itself immediately.  It usually takes an investigation to ferret it out.

Notice what happens if the logic of mainstream media, most of which was vehemently in favor of Biden’s election, holds sway. If there is massive, sophisticated fraud, it is never discovered because there is never an investigation to determine whether there was fraud. The reason there is no investigation is because there is no evidence of fraud immediately after the election. But the only way to discover the existence of electoral fraud is to conduct an investigation, which isn’t conducted because there is no evidence of fraud immediately after the election.

Let’s assume, for example, that there was election software that corrupt officials were able to use to manufacture whatever number of votes Biden needed to win. How could anyone be expected to ferret out that fraud immediately after the election? One would need an investigation to discover fraud on that sophisticated level. But the mainstream media’s argument is that there should be no investigation because there is no immediate evidence of the fraud. Thus, if the mainstream media’s argument is accepted, the fraud succeeds because there is never an investigation into the matter........read more.....

 

videorebel has some more thoughts and warnings for those who wish to have an idea what our future will be providing;

Catherine Austin Fitts said two things of importance for 2021 and after. She had beenmanaging partner at Dillon Read Investment Bank. She was Housing Catherine Austin Fitts said two things of importance for 2021 and after. She had been

managing partner at Dillon Read Investment Bank. She was Housing Commissioner

under HUD Secretary Jack Kemp in in the Bush I admin. 1) The Bankers and other

criminals who run our government stole $50 trillion from US taxpayers. 2) She said in

1995 after examining the situation that Wall Street would never make restitution. She

concluded that so much of our pensions assets had been stolen and replaced with

worthless paper that the only exit Wall Street can see is genocidal extinction of Americans.

All Depressions are periods in which Unpayable Debts are cancelled en masse. Bankers

have saddled us with more Unpayable  Debts to cancel than anytime in history which

means we are headed to a Depression far worse than 1933 America or 1923 Germany.

Debt Cancellation could be achieved painlessly if we were to arrest the Bankers, seize

their assets and use their stolen money to fund debt cancellation.

So all that is left is genocide. 6 billion plus people worldwide must die so that Bankers

can have better lives.

One method of depopulation would be vaccinations, digital tattoos and another bioweapon

far more deadly than the coronavirus. Dr Judy Mikovits said a covid vaccine could easily

kill 40 million Americans. Even more could die if they activate the nano particles that

come with the digital tattoo using microwave radiation. That could do terrible things to

the human body.

And the second bioweapon that Bill Gates hinted at could kill a few hundred million worldwide........read more......