larry johnson speaks of the charlie murder with further investigation ongoing;

I am sorry to return to the subject of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, but I am receiving a ton of emails with questions and theories and, rather than answer each one individually, I want to address some of the issues. Let me state up front that the flood of alternative theories about the firearm used to kill Charlie (e.g., a palm-pistol, a .30-06 rifle, a .22 pistol with a silencer) and the direction of the shot — i.e., from the front, from the side and from behind — tells me that Charlie’s murder was not the work of just one pissed-off 22-year-old who was in love with a transgender furry. Creating a number of false stories and false leads is something that an intelligence organization does in order to misdirect a law enforcement investigation. Frankly, we witnessed the same phenomena with the failed assassination attempt on Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania in July 2024.

For starters, it was not a palm-pistol that delivered the fatal shot. The ballistic sound recorded on film when Charlie was shot is not consistent with a pistol. But beyond the problems with the sound, a palm-pistol is a point-and-shoot weapon and it is not a firearm that allows for pinpoint accuracy. If you are seven yards away from the target — and you are shooting at a bullseye — you are not likely to hit the bullseye. Even the most skilled pistol shooters have trouble hitting a two-inch target at 25 yards and beyond. I have double-checked my thinking with one of my FBI Hostage Rescue Team buddies and he agrees...........more........