situational ethics seem to be the focus here, as if it was the quote i've heard before: these are my ethics and if you don't like those i have others;

After 85 Years, Democrats Reverse Their Position on (Some) Trespassing…

…and (some) devasting *blockades* as well. Remembering three major insurrections of the 20th century—the 1932 ‘Bonus Army’ invasion of Washington D.C., the nationalized union occupations of 1936-37, and the 1965 ‘Bloody Sunday’ bridge blockade in Selma—helps put the Jan 6 ‘assault on democracy’ into context. The two earlier uprisings are now largely forgotten, but the latter affair is still celebrated each year. All three events had lasting impacts on American culture.

For most of the last century, the Democrat wing of the D.C. uniparty have been outspoken champions of unleashing organized chaos to promote their increasingly totalitarian agenda. Many establishment Republicans share their collectivist mindset or do nothing meaningful to oppose it. The harsh persecution of January 6, 2021 Trump supporters should not distract anyone from recognizing that core position, as the J6 show trials and ongoing theatrics are mostly about keeping Donald Trump away from the White House in 2024—not “law and order.”

For this essay, I’ll bypass most of the partisan intrigue over the brief, largely spontaneous J6 event at the Capitol and look back to lasting, systemic damage done to the U.S. economy and our previous liberties from three major insurrections of the 20th century. All three episodes have been so distorted by mainstream news and government education as to almost completely obscure their underlying importance to modern society. Participants from all three events (particularly the latter two) achieved their goals by employing blockades upon their enemies, a powerful weapon that few elites can honestly discuss.........more........