the biden gang are traitors, and have been working for the new world order, davos, schwab goals. this post gets into a part of that, in the open border category;

“[Alejandro Mayorkas is] a traitor. He’s an absolute traitor. He lies under oath. He says that the border is secure. It’s not. He took an oath to protect us, and he’s not doing it…. The whole administration is the same way. Even our president, the president of the United States, I call him a traitor too.” 

Texas rancher Wayne King made this statement to Fox News reporter Lawrence Jones when asked about the migrant surge at Eagle Pass, Texas.

Calling the president of the United States a traitor is a serious accusation, and not one that should be made without a preponderance of evidence pointing toward the president’s perfidy.

The situation on the border with Mexico is undeniably untenable. Texas, as a “sovereign body, independent of all others” (Federalist 39), retains the authority secure its borders, regardless of federal cooperation or contravention. The federal government is not granted authority over immigration in the U.S. Constitution, thus Texas’s power to patrol its borders is specifically safeguarded by the Tenth Amendment.

The Tenth Amendment reads:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

There is an argument to be made, however, that the age, gender, and national origin of many of the “migrants” breaching the border constitutes an invasion, thus requiring the federal government to repel it, per the terms of Article IV, Section 4, which reads:

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion….

Whether it is immigration or invasion, the policy being pursued by Texas is lawful and rational, as is the frustration of farmers and ranchers, like that expressed by Wayne King.

Assuming, arguendo, that Texas (and several sister states) is being invaded and that the federal government has a constitutional obligation to repel the invaders, then King’s accusation against the White House would be accurate........more...........